entrepreneurial revolution: networks of systems, leadership economics & global villages

Transparency mapmaking seeks to explore the way that every being's natural human resource - the lifetime - is being invested. In effect, bubbles are about insider knowledge, over-promising and under-delivering. They give both economics and entrepreneurs a bad name. They do not lead to productive freedoms and happiness sustaining demands

It’s even more important to go beyond criticism to understand what successful preneurial revolutions can do. 30 years gives us enough time to do economic analysis on what preneurs can sustain through the future history of a generation. The answer, which we now have dozen of cases to guide people round, may surprise you : 100 fold return on investment but only when the societal returns are 1000 fold. Over a generation, the two are economically coupled. For example, 100-fold returns usually becomes a world class brand because it is known and relentlessly trusted for having multiplied that much goodwill. However the value100 brand architecture do not spend billions of dollars on annual advertising budgets as so many of the world’s biggest corporation brands do. Why should compounding goodwill to the greatest of every human being’s focal capabilities need that? At every step of a value100 brand’s intangibles valuation evolution it was core to society’s developing story too.

C This is where management and investors come in to integrate value multiplication but not in the standard (non-contextual) way that academic theorists or professional advisers are prone to lobby for. The magic of true preneurialism is always about the investment architecture that sustains a system which let’s some huge creative force flourish and flow whilst knowing that creative forces are so passionate about how the idea will change the world that they will need to be facilitated iteratively through conflicts which may be with timing, money, the previous organisational system and whether any co-workers want to make a difference when the old system is currently offering all the rewards and none of the risks. At this stage, ugly as it may be in literary terms it will be much clearer for future debating networks if we identify various preneurial labels. First we can also summarise mathematically what we have productivities & demands we have multiplied so far:
A) V2
B) V2*V5
C) K3*V3 (* select one of K1, K2, K4, K5) *V2*V5

C1 Usually entrepreneurs revolve the system spirals around a classical breakthrough invention (a new thing) but not a service economy, ie the source of innovation to be multiplicatively flowed is coordinated round K1

C2 Usually, intrapreneurs invent a team-based design or project franchised that once perfected in one place has the value multipliers of every place a team could locally serve it, ie unleash K2

C3 Tomorrow, there will be all sorts of other networking preneurs given sustainability challenges around the world – do we want to develop any organisations that value life even if the profitable economies come after changing corruptions of nature or of community that have happened where a big power’s influence has decimated diversity and grassroots infrastructures. Preneurialism needs to flow through governments, NGOs (Non Governmental Organisations) and charities but in ways that again starts with the gravity that the “customer” and the societal deep vision can bring. If this paragraph sounds like a dream rather than a preneurial reality then I would suggest you look at the microfinance movement that has relaunched more sustainable economies in the developing world than large finance, as well as map back what will happen to future generations if any global sector’s exponential is permitted to go into exponential destruction. Eight years after writing entrepreneurial revolution, my father’s 1984 book forecast that this crisis of globalisation would need to be reconciled by the majority of the people of the world getting up, using media in the most humanly preneurial ways seen for a century (which is what networks can be), and revolutionising other stuff that values everyone’s life as well as money. Have a look at the timeline summary here. http://www.normanmacrae.com/netfuture.html

For those with the hardest noses on this subject, all the rest of us will transparently need to change risk analysis (eg Intangibles Crisis Union networkers ask why one of the 5 biggest Gloibal Accountants Arthur Andersen did not know that value multiplies when their leaders operated undee the assumption that zero value to society and billions of value to business stakeholders would lead to billions+0=billions instead of the reality of billion*0=0). Ordinary people everywhere need to link together and cheer every news-story of deep democracy of governance discovered anywhere on our globe- until the hard-nosers see that they are in an extreme minority –the terrorising bottom line - wherever they are arguing that 6 billion being people want to profit now and end the sustainability of the generation after next. This endgame has not been the compound valuation dynamics that the human species has ever wanted before, so we doubt it’s what humanity feels it needs today. But how many people know that is the number 1 globalisation question being asked unless public broadcasters and journalists for humanity will help us explore it everywhere, and now!

System debates of the 30 year learning curve of preneurial revolution will continue through co-edited blogs listed below. We aim to offer you the opportunity to co-create buckets full of examples of C1, C2, C3. But as we mentioned deeply human communal contexts and worldwide industry sectors matter. If your life’s work is about what a particular sector’s best for the world exponentials could be, why not mail me at wcbn007@easynet.co.uk. I am trying to play a worldwide game of snap with people whop are passionate about the same sector. I can tell you if I know anyone who matches your exploration, and offer should you wish an email introduction.

Chris Macrae, mailto:wcbn007@easynet.co.uk?subject=ER

posted by ... @ 6:29 AM 0 comments